Schölkopf B, Smola AJ (2002) Learning with kernels, support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. Ramadan A, Mustafa H (2013) Surge tank design consideration for controlling water hammer at hydro-electric power plants. Mo S, Lu D, Shi X, Zhang G, Ye M, Wu J, Wu J (2017) A Taylor expansion-based adaptive design strategy for global surrogate modeling with applications in groundwater modeling. 19th international congress on modelling and simulation, Perth Mirfendereski G, Mousavi SJ (2011) Comparition of support vector machines and response surface models in meta-modeling applied in basin-scale optimum water allocation. Leshno M, Lin VY, Pinkus A, Schocken S (1993) Multilayer feedforward networks with a non-polynomial activation function can approximate any function. Kim SG, LEE KB, KIM KY (2015) Water hammer in the pump- rising pipeline system with an air chamber. Kendir TE, Ozdamar A (2013) Numerical and experimental investigation of optimum surge tank forms in hydroelectric power plants. Jung BS, Boulos PF, Altman T (2011) Optimal transient network design a multi- objective approach. World environmental and water resources congress, Kansas City Jung BS, Muleta M, Boulos PF (2009) Multi-objective design of transient network models. Jung BS, Karney BW (2006) Hydraulic optimization of transient protection device using GA and PSO approaches. Optimum selection of hydraulic devices for water hammer control in the pipeline system using Genetic Algoritm, 4th joint Fluids summer engineering conference. Iphar M (2012) ANN and ANFIS performance prediction models for hydraulic impact hammers. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) (1989) multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297įathi moghaddam M, Haghighipour S, Mohammad Vali Samani H (2013) Design- variable optimization of hydropower tunnels and surge tank using a genetic Algoritm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136(4):433–443Ĭortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Environ Model Softw 24(4):530–541īroad DR, Maier HR, Dandy GC (2010) Optimal operation of complex water distribution systems using metamodels. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 60(7):434–447īehzadian K, Kapelan Z, Savic D, Ardeshir A (2009) Stochastic sampling design using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and adaptive neural networks. Int J Eng 17:339–345īayat B, Mousavi SJ, Namin MM (2011) Optimization–simulation for short-term reservoir operation under flooding conditions. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(9)Īzhary Moghaddam M (2004) Analysis and design of simple surge tank. Results also showed that air chamber is the most effective device and air-valves have little effect for pipeline protection against water hammer.Īndrade MA, Choi CY, Lansey K, Jung D (2016) Enhanced artificial neural networks estimating water quality constraints for the optimal water distribution systems design. The single objective-based design could decrease the costs up to 12.5% whereas multi-objective approach was able to reach nearly 30% cost saving with higher level of the safety against cavitation. The results showed that multi-objective optimization approach presents better designs than the single objective approach and optimal designs obtained by both approaches outperform the current setup of the water hammer facilities in terms of both costs and functionality. Optimization was carried out on two single- and multi-objective approaches. Then, ANN was coupled with an evolutionary algorithm (EA), Differential Evolution (DE) to find the optimal size and location of water hammer control devices in a water pipeline. According to the results, SVR was identified as the inferior method due to low capability of generalization, ANFIS as the median, and ANN as the superior method for function approximation. The accuracy of three meta models: artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR) and adaptive neuro-fussy inference system (ANFIS) was evaluated. In this paper, the simulation task was carried out by meta modeling. An economic design of these devices that also provides the safety of the pipeline against water hammer pressure waves and cavitation can be achieved by simulation and optimization tools. To decrease the negative effects of pressure waves, costly equipment are implemented in pipelines. Positive and negative pressure waves caused by water hammer possibly may lead to high damages to the water conveyance pipelines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |